09/22/2019 / By Ethan Huff
It’s not enough for leftists to simply have their political and ideological foes muzzled as far as engaging in online free speech. Now, the left wants to see you banned from Facebook and other social media platform simply for holding viewpoints with which they disagree – even if you don’t actually express those views on your accounts.
The pro-life organization Live Action discovered this recently after its Facebook page was “fact-checked” by a group of pro-death abortionists. These abortion enthusiasts apparently contacted Facebook with their “fact-check,” and Facebook responded by threatening to remove Live Action’s page from its platform.
Senators Josh Hawley (R-MI) and Ted Cruz (R-TX) reportedly sent a letter to Facebook after being notified about the threat to Live Action. But Facebook is refusing to back down, demonstrating that Mark Zuckerberg and his minions are ratcheting up their anti-free speech agenda since they know they can get away with doing pretty much whatever they want.
“People who lie about abortion should be banned from Facebook for spreading hate,” wrote one proud baby-murderer named Dr. Jennifer Gunter on her Twitter account.
For more news about how leftists love to murder babies and have basically made abortion a type of sacrifice ritual to their pro-death gods, be sure to check out Abortions.news.
It’s important to point out here that Facebook, apparently realizing that the direction it’s headed in no way aligns with being a service provider, now admits that the company is acting as a content publisher.
This is significant because, as was previously pointed out last year, Facebook and the rest of the tech cabal currently maintain unfair legal immunity against lawsuits due to their recognized status as content providers, which is no longer the case.
Facebook basically now functions in the same way as CNN or Buzzfeed, publishing only what it agrees with while censoring everything else. And now the platform wants to actually ban users simply for holding viewpoints that contradict what its executives and employees believe, which means Facebook is now more an online newspaper than it is a social media service provider.
Because of this, Facebook no longer qualifies for the legal protections it’s long maintained under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), which need to be immediately stripped from the company now that it’s basically just another far-left “news” outlet run by deep state operatives like Mark Zuckerberg.
According to Facebook and its far-left user base, speaking out against the violence of abortion and baby murder is now “hate speech,” and Live Action needs to be barred from expressing it. Furthermore, Facebook and the left appear to be in agreement that only people with “medical expertise” should be allowed to talk about abortion online.
“The irony here is that Lila Rose, the founder of Live Action, was echoing the professional opinions of several doctors,” writes Corinne Weaver for Newsbusters, pointing out that the viewpoints and positions of Live Action are, in fact, completely centered around science and medicine.
If you’re still on Facebook in light of all these transgressions, we can only ask: why? Facebook, as well as Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, YouTube, Google, MailChimp, and many others are nothing more than anti-American corporations run by the deep state, which is working overtime right now to stamp out free speech and the First Amendment, both online and in the public square.
“It was my choice and I decided that it was in my best interest to abort Facebook from my life,” wrote on Newsbusters commenter in response to this latest news. “It was a great decision.”
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
abortion, ban, Big Tech, Facebook, Glitch, infanticide, information control, Liberty, mark zuckerberg, murder, online content publisher, technocrats, thought control, zuckerberg
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 SPEECHPOLICE.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. SpeechPolice.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. SpeechPolice.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.