11/04/2020 / By Ethan Huff
Many of our readers are familiar with Big Tech companies like Facebook and Twitter censoring content they deem as “misinformation.” But did you know that Yahoo Mail is now doing the same thing with people’s private emails?
Ben Garrison from GrrrGraphics.com wrote a piece for Zero Hedge all about what he encountered when trying to send an email about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) to a friend in Germany. Because Garrison questioned the official narrative about the plandemic, his email was kicked back to him as “undeliverable.”
“For many years I traded occasional emails about classical music and culture with him,” Garrison writes. “This time I typed an email concerning the corona virus and I expressed some doubt about what our ‘authorities’ had been asserting.”
“I sent the email and a few minutes later it got kicked back to me by Yahoo,” he adds. “They said my mail had been censored for spreading ‘misinformation.’ That’s hard core censorship. It was as if the Post Office had opened my private mail, and returned it as undeliverable because the post master didn’t agree with my opinion.”
At the time, Garrison says he was only using Yahoo Mail as a “backup,” recognizing that the platform is connected to Yahoo News, which also censors content.
“Shortly thereafter, Yahoo banned all commentary to their news stories,” Garrison explains. “I often skipped their biased stories and went straight to the comments. Most of the commenters were onto the bias. So what did Yahoo do? They simply shut everyone up.”
The censorship situation is out of control. To keep up with the latest, be sure to check out Censorship.news.
Garrison worries that online censorship is becoming so commonplace and almost expected that many Americans are no longer even trying to fight against it.
“Americans have not sufficiently pushed back,” he writes. “Many simply accept getting silenced as a new reality. Our Fourth Amendment has been obliterated and now the First Amendment is under assault.”
The only protests that meet political correctness guidelines seem to be the kind focused around causes related to socialism, black empowerment and abolishing the police. Everything else is off limits and subject to censorship by the tech overlords.
“We are no longer allowed to assemble unless we are socialist protestors,” Garrison contends. “Mandatory vaccines are on the horizon. If we speak out against it, we’ll be censored.”
Talking about Huntergate is also prohibited on most major social media platforms, though some of them have backed off slightly in policing posts that suggest it might have some merit.
The entire mainstream media machine has systematically ignored Joe Biden’s financial ties to communist China, instead choosing to side with deep state traitors like Adam Schiff who claims it is all just a bunch of Russian propaganda.
“How long will the Deep State keep resorting to that canard?” Garrison asks. “It doesn’t matter if we believe it or not, as long as we are rendered quiescent as they murder our free speech.”
Slowly but surely, the United States is becoming communist China – that is if the Bidens and the Schiffs of the world remain in power. The jury is still out on President Trump, but at least he has made strides to bring China to its knees and stymie its influence in our country.
“Any politician or CEO that justifies clamping down on free speech for the benefit of ‘the greater good’ is a traitor that deserves to be stripped of all power, wealth, and influence,” one Zero Hedge commenter wrote.
“Strip them of (Section) 230, problem solved,” wrote another.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
Big Tech, Censorship, misleading, outgoing emails, privacy watch, Section 230, Yahoo mail
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 SPEECHPOLICE.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. SpeechPolice.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. SpeechPolice.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.