05/26/2020 / By Ethan Huff
If it were up to failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Americans would be stuck in lockdown forever. And those that are trying to leave their government-erected human cattle pens even now are guilty of “domestic terrorism,” she says.
Speaking against the armed protests taking place in Michigan, Clinton stated that free speech and the First Amendment “cannot be tolerated.” Instead, Americans need to just put on their masks, walk in six-foot-distanced formations at all times, and keep their mouths shut, according to Clinton.
“Armed men storming a legislature to disrupt its democratic proceedings is domestic terrorism,” Clinton wrote in a recent tweet, not from her rightful prison cell but presumably from one of her luxury estates. “It cannot be tolerated.”
Clinton’s declaration against freedom-loving Americans comes on the heels of Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s order that Michiganders basically stay home forever until the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) stops existing, or something. And rather than accept this unconstitutional “order,” many Michiganders are protesting against it, which Clinton thinks is akin to a terrorist attack.
On May 22, Whitmer extended Michigan’s lockdown to June 12, making this her fifth extension of the state’s stay-at-home order since the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a global pandemic.
“If we’re going to lower the chance of a second wave and continue to protect our neighbors and loved ones from the spread of this virus, we must continue to do our part by staying safer at home,” Whitmer stated about this latest extension, declaring that “we are not out of the woods yet.”
Listen below to The Health Ranger Report as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks with Dr. Paul Cottrell about the rising medical police state in today’s America:
The draconian orders and restrictions being imposed in many cities and states across the U.S. in response to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) – almost none of which are lawful or even constitutional, by the way – fully warrant armed raids of government buildings by patriotic citizens. Heck, this is what our Founding Fathers essentially did when they broke away from the British crown and started this country in the first place.
But somehow trying to defend the Republic against the “new normal” is seen as “terrorism” by today’s Democrats, who apparently believe that freedom and liberty are fully disposable in the event that a scary virus makes an appearance. If the mere possibility of some people getting sick from some invisible contagion is the new litmus test for whether or not Americans are allowed to leave their homes, then this country will never see freedom again.
The left had better think long and hard about the type of world it is now ushering in to get back at Trump’s economy, or whatever it is that the Democrats are trying to accomplish by throwing our Constitution on a proverbial funeral pyre. At some point these obedience and submission orders by the likes of Clinton and Whitmer are going to trample the things that progressives hold near and dear – and then what?
One thing that Whitmer is right about is that “now is not a time for division.” She says that Americans need to “pull together,” and we agree – but not in the way that she means. What Americans need to unify on now more than ever is to fight against the “new normal,” and instead return back to the old normal where freedom and liberty were held in high regard transcending all perceived threats, including scary viruses.
To keep up with the latest news about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19), be sure to check out Pandemic.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: CCP virus, coronavirus, covid-19, domestic terrorism, domestic terrorists, failed presidential candidate, First Amendment, freedom, hillary, Hillary Clinton, insanity, left cult, Liberty, lockdown protesters, Michigan, President Trump, protests, Wuhan coronavirus
COPYRIGHT © 2018 SPEECHPOLICE.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. SpeechPolice.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. SpeechPolice.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.