07/03/2020 / By Ethan Huff
Unless Facebook agrees to put a digital muzzle on President Donald Trump, CNN, Joe Biden, and liberals everywhere are threatening to flee the platform as punishment.
CNN‘s Kara Alaimo, a former “communicator” in the Obama administration, says that Mark Zuckerberg should be doing more than just removing ads from the Trump campaign that link Antifa to Nazi Germany. She thinks that President Trump should be silenced in order to stamp out “hate.”
Facebook’s removal of this ad, she writes, represents a mere “baby step,” and is “the beginning of what Facebook must do to confront rhetoric that has become dangerous for both the country and the platform.”
As a regular contributor to the CNN fake news empire, Alaimo is proudly outspoken when it comes to opposing free speech and the First Amendment. Liberals, in her view, should be allowed to say whatever they want, while conservatives, including President Trump, should be silenced for the good of the country.
Joe Biden has also come out to condemn free speech and the First Amendment with the unveiling of a presidential campaign petition calling on Facebook to ban President Trump and others who “post incendiary content,” to quote Alaimo.
“Facebook should respond by working with other social networks to create a nonpartisan organization to set standards for policing content on all major platforms,” Alaimo writes, openly endorsing “policing,” just so long as it is conservatives who are policed and not leftists or black people.
Alaimo has not come out to condemn Facebook for allowing Antifa and Black Lives Matter (BLM) terrorists to use Facebook for organizing events such as the latest trend of shooting people in their vehicles – listen below to The Health Ranger Report to learn more:
Beyond just President Trump, Alaimo and Biden would also like to see all others who post “misinformation” that goes viral get censored by Facebook. All political advertising especially, they insist, must contain “factual information” as defined by leftists, otherwise it has to go.
In Alaimo’s view, President Trump’s expressed concern about the legitimacy of mail-in ballots was “misleading.” She also thinks that his recent Twitter post about sending in the National Guard to protect national landmarks and innocent civilians from Antifa terrorism was “threatening.”
Of course, Alaimo spun the issue as President Trump “threatening to send in the National Guard against Americans protesting police violence,” which is just the type of fake news reporting we have come to expect from the likes of CNN.
Thus far, Zuckerberg has only issued statements condemning President Trump for his “divisive and incendiary rhetoric at a time when our nation so desperately needs unity.” And because he left it at that, Alaimo, Biden and others are outraged and demanding that more be done to stop the president.
“Clearly, by allowing the President to use his platform to spread lies and threats, Zuckerberg is aiding Trump’s reelection prospects, even if he claims to merely be promoting free speech,” Alaimo whines.
“By allowing misleading or false content on the site, Zuckerberg is making it harder for Americans to identify the accurate information they need to make informed choices as voters and citizens. And by permitting violent posts, how can Zuckerberg claim not to be promoting violence?”
We do not often share these types of direct quotes from the likes of CNN because, quite frankly, they are hardly worth reading. But we want our readers to understand how blatantly deceptive these fake news outlets are when it comes to reversing the narrative and bullying anyone who gets in the way of their anti-Trump agenda.
To keep up with the latest news about Big Tech censorship, be sure to check out Censorship.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: Biden, Big Tech, Censorship, CNN, Facebook, hypocrisy, information control, Joe Biden, Tyranny
COPYRIGHT © 2018 SPEECHPOLICE.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. SpeechPolice.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. SpeechPolice.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.