10/09/2019 / By Ethan Huff
Democratic presidential contender Kamala Harris is outraged that President Trump has the freedom to communicate directly with We the People via Twitter, and wants to see him completely cut off from the social media platform in order to alleviate her triggering.
During a recent appearance on CNN, Kamala told host Anderson Cooper that Trump’s Twitter account “should be suspended” because “there is plenty of evidence to suggest that he’s irresponsible with his words in a way that could result in harm to other people,” which in Kamala’s mind is justification for blatant censorship.
“So, the privilege of using those words in that way should probably be taken from him,” Kamala went on to state as Cooper struggled, it seemed, not to laugh while trying to take her seriously.
Censoring the voices of people you don’t like is tried-and-true fascism, of course, which leftists like Kamala vehemently claim to oppose. But free speech apparently doesn’t apply to President Trump, nor does it apply to his supporters, at least in the minds of the Democratic circus clowns running for president in 2020.
“Cory Booker called for Trump rallies to be canceled,” noted Matt Wolking, the Trump campaign’s Deputy Director of Communications and Rapid Response, in a tweet following Kamala’s CNN appearance.
“Beto O’Rourke called on tech companies to censor content,” he added. “Julian Castro campaign posted target list of Trump supporters. Silence the opposition. This is liberal fascism.”
To learn more about leftist-fascism and the Democratic trend towards censorship and the silencing of all opposition, be sure to check out Censorship.news.
Just days before announcing to CNN viewers that she hates the First Amendment, Kamala also appeared at one of the Democratic “debates” where she was asked questions about climate change, to which she responded with similar stupidity.
When the issue of red meat consumption came up as a question, Kamala agreed with the sentiment that Americans should probably go the “plant-based” route in order to save the planet from “global warming.”
“As a nation, we actually have to have a real priority at the highest level of government around what we eat in terms of healthy eating because we have a problem in America,” Kamala stated, apparently forgetting that just days before that, she was scarfing down pork chops in Iowa at a campaign stop.
The hypocrisy just never ends with these leftists, as Joe Biden did much the same thing when he participated in a “steak fry,” also in Iowa.
“I thought beef was not on the Green New Deal menu?” wrote one Twitter commenter in response to a tweet from Biden showing him serving up these steaks, adding that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) “won’t be happy with you.”
It’s important to point out, here, that Kamala was also present at the steak fry, during which some 10,500 steaks were thrown on the grill and served up to eager patrons and potential voters whom Kamala continues to lecture about the “detriments” of eating red meat.
“The Steak Fry will be a great opportunity for caucus-goers to grill 2020 Democrats on their extreme policies that would limit Iowans’ freedoms and liberties,” stated Jeff Kaufmann, chairman of the Republican Party of Iowa, in a pun-filled statement addressing the blatant hypocrisy of these supposedly anti-meat Democrats.
“As they continue butchering their positions, it’s clear the Democratic agenda would steer us in the wrong direction,” he added.
For more related news about the Democratic political circus, be sure to check out Stupid.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: banned, bias, Censored, Censorship, conservatives, democrats, fascism, First Amendment, free speech, Google, hypocrisy, Kamala, Kamala Harris, left cult, Orwellian, Social media, target supporters, triggered, Tyranny
COPYRIGHT © 2018 SPEECHPOLICE.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. SpeechPolice.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. SpeechPolice.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.